Articles
Mar 2017
Mar 2017
The IP High Court found that Plaintiff’s configuration of goods is not qualified as "an indication of goods" under the Unfair Competition Prevention Act due to the lack of "Noticeable Feature" (Intellectual Property High Court, July 27, 2016)
| Authors | Yuta Oishi |
|---|---|
| Publisher | IP-L Communications Inc. |
| Publication | Patents & Licensing (Vol.46 No.5) 2017 |
| Issue | Mar 2017 |
| Practice Areas | Intellectual Property/TMT |
Our associate, Yuta Oishi authored an article in the following publication.
"The IP High Court found that Plaintiff’s configuration of goods is not qualified as "an indication of goods" under the Unfair Competition Prevention Act due to the lack of "Noticeable Feature" (Intellectual Property High Court, July 27, 2016)"
(Patents & Licensing, Vol. 46, No. 5 (2017))
"The IP High Court found that Plaintiff’s configuration of goods is not qualified as "an indication of goods" under the Unfair Competition Prevention Act due to the lack of "Noticeable Feature" (Intellectual Property High Court, July 27, 2016)"
(Patents & Licensing, Vol. 46, No. 5 (2017))